RESUMEN
Background: Concomitant traumatic brain injury (TBI) and ocular trauma (OT) are caused by the same physical mechanisms, which may complicate therapeutic intervention if screening and evaluation of each condition are not promptly initiated. The aim of this study is to identify concomitant TBI in OT patients and characterize the pattern of those injured service members (SMs) in non-combat environments to assist in the early detection and treatment of both TBI and OT. Methods: Encounters matching the case definitions of TBI and OT for injured SMs were extracted from the Military Health System. Concomitant TBI and OT was identified as patients who were diagnosed with both medical conditions within 30 days. Incidence rates of concomitance were analyzed using a Poisson regression model. The odds of mechanisms and types of OT with concomitant TBI were analyzed using logistic regression models. Results: From 2017 to 2021, there were 71 689 SMs diagnosed with TBI, and 69 358 patients diagnosed with OT. There were 3251 concomitant cases identified. The overall concomitance rate in OT patients was 4.7%. Clinical presentations of concomitant OT had a higher rate of complications. Blast, transport accidents, assaults, alcohol, falls, and sports-related injuries (in decreasing order) were significantly associated with concomitance rates. Compared with closed globe injuries, OT with orbital fractures, rupture, laceration, adnexal periocular injury, and penetrating injury had higher risks of concomitant TBI. For patients with orbital fractures, nearly half (44.1%) sustained a concomitant TBI. Conclusions: A practical approach using temporal proximity of diagnostic data was developed to identify concomitant cases of TBI and OT which presented with more severe injury types than non-concomitant cases. These results indicate OT patients with orbital or open globe injuries sustained from high-impact mechanisms warrant further TBI screening to prompt early detection and treatment. Level of evidence: IV.
RESUMEN
ABSTRACT: IntroductionWe aimed to identify injury-related risk factors for secondary cataract incidence after eye and brain injury and polytrauma. We also examined the effect of direct and indirect eye injury management on cataract diagnosis and treatment. Prevention or mitigation strategies require knowledge of the causes and types of combat injuries, which will enable more appropriate targeting of resources toward prevention and more efficient management of such injuries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were gathered from the Military Health System using the Military Health System Management and Analysis Reporting Tool (M2) between 2017 and 2021 from inpatient and outpatient Service Members (SMs) (active duty and National Guard). The date of the first cataract diagnosis was tracked to estimate the annual incidence rate, and it was longitudinally linked to any prior diagnosis of ocular trauma (OT), traumatic brain injury (TBI), or polytrauma to calculate the relative risk. International Classification of Disease codes, 10th Revision, were used to identify those diagnosed with cataracts, TBI, and polytrauma. Defense and Veterans Eye Injury and Vision Registry data were used to examine SMs who sustained ocular injuries from 2003-2020 and who may have had cataract surgery following a cataract diagnosis. RESULTS: The relative risk of traumatic cataract formation from OT, TBI, and polytrauma are 5.71 (95% CI, 5.05-6.42), 2.32 (95% CI, 2.03-2.63), and 8.95 (95% CI, 6.23-12.38), respectively. Traumatic cataracts in SMs more commonly result from open-globe injuries (70%) than closed-globe injuries (30%). By specific sub-injury type, traumatic cataracts occur most frequently from intraocular foreign bodies (22%). More than 400 patients in the cohort suffered from TBI and traumatic cataracts, more than 300 from OT and cataracts, and more than 20 from polytrauma and cataracts. The battlefield is the riskiest environment for trauma exposure, with 62% of OT occurring in combat. There was a statistically significant difference between the mean visual acuity value before cataract surgery (M = 1.17, SD = 0.72) and the mean visual acuity value after cataract surgery (M = 0.44, SD = 0.66, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Traumatic cataracts often occur in SMs who sustain ocular injuries. New to the literature is that relationships exist between traumatic cataract formation and nonglobe trauma, specifically TBI and polytrauma. Ocular injury calls for an ophthalmic examination. A low threshold should exist for routine ocular exam consultation in the setting of TBI and polytrauma. Separately, polytrauma patients should undergo a review of systems questions, particularly questions about the ocular and visual pathways. A positive response to screening warrants further investigation of possible ocular pathology, including traumatic cataract formation. Cataract surgery is an effective treatment in improving the vision of SMs who suffer from traumatic cataracts. Constant effort must be made to limit occurrences of occupation-related traumatic cataracts.
